CNN CARRIES WATER FOR DEMOCRAT'S

What liberal media? H/T The Atlantic via Drudge

Debate? Nope, just the latest dog and pony show from our comrade's over at the Communist New's Network. Surprised? Nope. Shocked? Not in the least. I think's it's just pathetic that once again the poodles from the MSM are jumping through hoop's for their Defeatocrat master's, Hillarious Clinton inparticular. CNN is so far up the Hildabeast's a$$ I'll bet if she opened her mouth wide enough you could watch it.

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student who asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate wrote on her MySpace page this morning that CNN forced her to ask the frilly question instead of a pre-approved query about the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

"Every single question asked during the debate by the audience had to be approved by CNN," Luisa writes. "I was asked to submit questions including "lighthearted/fun" questions. I submitted more than five questions on issues important to me. I did a policy memo on Yucca Mountain a year ago and was the finalist for the Truman Scholarship. For sure, I thought I would get to ask the Yucca question that was APPROVED by CNN days in advance."

Now, Luisa is getting "swamped" with critical e-mails.

So what happened?

Writes Luisa:

"CNN ran out of time and used me to "close" the debate with the pearls/diamonds question. Seconds later this girl comes up to me and says, "you gave our school a bad reputation.' Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That's what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality. So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source. If you want me to explain to you how the media works, I am more than happy to do so. But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question."

Now the last debate with Tim Russert, now that was half a debate. Have we as a society de-generated so fully, that now it's not just the majority of the MSM carrying water for Liberal's against Conservatives, but now the MSM has broken off into faction's and are warring with each other, either for Hillary or against?

Ask honest biting question's and let the candidates make or break themselves on both sides, that's what honest debate, and campaigning's all about. Debates Republican, or Conservative should be dogfight's, not kindergarten coloring time.

Politician's are wrong. This is the nation of viral Video,Survivor, Big Brother and Jerry Springer. America does want to see mudslinging and the politic's of personal destruction in all it's 60" HDTV technicolor glory. Who ever makes it out of that stinking pile of sweat, adrenaline, and arrogance, that's who deserves to be president. After all what is a debate but reality T.V.? The object of both being to see who get's voted off.

Rivals to Clinton believe that the debate audience had a pro-Clinton tilt. UNLV
was responsible for distributing most of the tickets.

At least Tim Russert and MSNBC kept it real and tried for awhile to make it look honest anyway, and trust me I'm no fan of PMSNBC. CNN the ( Clinton Nomination Now ) or bust network, is nothing but Hillary's rickshaw boy.