Saturday, November 3, 2007

Of course the answer wasn't misleading at all,..............



..............just the question.


"Former President Clinton said Friday that a letter he wrote to the National
Archives was to expedite release of his papers, not slow the process or hide
anything as rivals are suggesting in criticism of his wife. Hillary Rodham
Clinton was quizzed during this week's Democratic presidential debate as to why
correspondence between her and her husband from their White House years remained bottled up at the National Archives. Barack Obama said that was a problem for her as a candidate after "we have just gone through one of the most secretive administrations in our history." One issue is whether Bill Clinton had sent a letter to the Archives asking that the communications not be released until 2012, and whether Hillary Clinton would lift any ban, a question raised by debate moderator Tim Russert."




Of course not releasing said correspondence until 2012 perfectly coincides with Hillary possibly being elected for four years, how convenient. You can bet the baby's milk money though, that if she is elected that date will be moved up to 2016.

The real question here is not what the Clintons have to hide, it's what don't they have to hide.

No comments: